Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104355›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2025

Sensitive and specific fNIRS-based approach for awareness detection in disorders of consciousness: proof of principle in healthy adults.

Lisa Bastian, Tim Näher, Anna Vorreuther, Michael Lührs, Amaia Benitez Andonegui, Pascal Fries, Lars Riecke, Bettina Sorger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lisa BastianMaastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5812-0556
Tim NäherMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-0035
Anna VorreutherMaastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3556-2486
Michael LührsMaastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5888-0843
Amaia Benitez AndoneguiMaastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pascal FriesMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4270-1468
Lars RieckeMaastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Bettina SorgerMaastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-3144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Disorders of consciousness (DoCs) are characterized by varying levels of arousal and awareness. Due to severe motor impairments often accompanying these conditions, differentiating between minimally conscious state (MCS) and unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) remains challenging. Accurate diagnosis, however, is critical for optimal treatment and prognosis. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), due to its portability and noninvasiveness, holds promise for brain-based diagnostics, although current methods lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Methods: We introduce a highly sensitive, and specific fNIRS-based diagnostic approach tailored to the individual cognitive state of DoC patients. Nine healthy participants received auditory cues instructing them to either perform individually tailored motor-speech imagery or remain at rest. In separate runs, participants were instructed to be responsive to these cues to mimic MCS, or unresponsive, to mimic UWS. fNIRS-channel covariance matrices were classified for responsive and unresponsive states as either imagery or rest using a Riemannian-geometry-based approach. Results: Classification between responsive and unresponsive states achieved a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 89% across participants. Within the two states, imagery and rest were classified with 83,9% and 55,93% accuracy, respectively; the latter result, close to chance level, was expected in the unresponsive state. Conclusion: This individualized diagnostic approach may have the potential to significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy for DoCs. It provides a noninvasive, efficient, and objective assessment, potentially reducing the rate of misdiagnosis rates. The practicality and minimal technical requirements of fNIRS further support future clinical implementation.

Indexed as

comadiagnosisdisorders of consciousnessfunctional near-infrared spectroscopymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41104355
PMCPMC12521986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.