ArticleNeurophotonics2025
Sensitive and specific fNIRS-based approach for awareness detection in disorders of consciousness: proof of principle in healthy adults.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Disorders of consciousness (DoCs) are characterized by varying levels of arousal and awareness. Due to severe motor impairments often accompanying these conditions, differentiating between minimally conscious state (MCS) and unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) remains challenging. Accurate diagnosis, however, is critical for optimal treatment and prognosis. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), due to its portability and noninvasiveness, holds promise for brain-based diagnostics, although current methods lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Methods: We introduce a highly sensitive, and specific fNIRS-based diagnostic approach tailored to the individual cognitive state of DoC patients. Nine healthy participants received auditory cues instructing them to either perform individually tailored motor-speech imagery or remain at rest. In separate runs, participants were instructed to be responsive to these cues to mimic MCS, or unresponsive, to mimic UWS. fNIRS-channel covariance matrices were classified for responsive and unresponsive states as either imagery or rest using a Riemannian-geometry-based approach. Results: Classification between responsive and unresponsive states achieved a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 89% across participants. Within the two states, imagery and rest were classified with 83,9% and 55,93% accuracy, respectively; the latter result, close to chance level, was expected in the unresponsive state. Conclusion: This individualized diagnostic approach may have the potential to significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy for DoCs. It provides a noninvasive, efficient, and objective assessment, potentially reducing the rate of misdiagnosis rates. The practicality and minimal technical requirements of fNIRS further support future clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.