Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104354›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2025

Riemannian geometry boosts functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based brain-state classification accuracy.

Tim Näher, Lisa Bastian, Anna Vorreuther, Pascal Fries, Rainer Goebel, Bettina Sorger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tim NäherMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.
Lisa BastianUniversity of Tübingen, Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5812-0556
Anna VorreutherUniversity of Stuttgart, Applied Neurocognitive Systems, Institute of Human Factors and Technology Management (IAT), Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3556-2486
Pascal FriesMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4270-1468
Rainer GoebelMaastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1780-2467
Bettina SorgerMaastricht University, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-3144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has recently gained momentum as a reliable and accurate tool for assessing brain states based on the vascular response to neural activity. This increase in popularity is due to its robustness to movement, non-invasive nature, portability, and user-friendly application. However, compared with other hemodynamic functional brain-imaging methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), fNIRS is constrained by its limited spatial resolution and coverage with a particularly limited penetration depth. In addition, due to comparatively fewer methodological advancements, the performance of fNIRS-based brain-state classification still lags behind more prevalent methods such as fMRI. Methods: We introduce a classification approach grounded in Riemannian geometry for the classification of kernel matrices, leveraging the temporal and spatial relationships between channels and the inherent duality of fNIRS signals, specifically oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin. For the Riemannian-geometry-based models, we compared different kernel matrix estimators and two classifiers: Riemannian Support Vector Classifier and Tangent Space Logistic Regression. These were benchmarked against four models employing traditional feature extraction methods. Our approach was tested on seven participants in two brain-state classification scenarios based on the same fNIRS dataset: an eight-choice classification, which includes seven established plus an individually selected imagery task, and a two-choice classification of all possible 28 two-task combinations. Results: This approach achieved a mean eight-choice classification accuracy of 65%, significantly surpassing the mean accuracy of 42% obtained with traditional methods. In addition, the best-performing model achieved an average accuracy of 96% for two-choice classification across all task combinations, compared with 78% with traditional models. Conclusion: To our knowledge, we are the first to demonstrate that the proposed Riemannian-geometry-based classification approach is both powerful and viable for fNIRS data, substantially increasing the accuracy in binary and multi-class classification of brain activation patterns.

Indexed as

brain-machine interfacebrain-state classificationfunctional near-infrared spectroscopymachine learningRiemannian geometry

Identifiers

PMID41104354
PMCPMC12523035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.