Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104348›Full record

ArticleCase reports in dentistry2025

Endodontic Reapproach in a Tooth With External Resorption: Case Report.

Maiara Almeida de Matos, Tais Rocha Donato, Caliandra Pinto Araújo

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maiara Almeida de MatosEndodontics Graduate Program, Professors' Group in Surgery and Implantology, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2859-6405
Tais Rocha DonatoDepartment of General Dentistry, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3895-4531
Caliandra Pinto AraújoDepartment of General Dentistry, State University of Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-2366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Endodontists face various challenges, and some factors are associated with endodontic treatment failure, such as the presence of resistant microorganisms resulting from inefficient disinfection and nonadhesive coronary sealing. The quality of the execution of the operative protocols, cautious irrigation, and the presence of a hermetic seal from the crown to the apex lead to successful endodontic retreatment. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study approached a female patient, aged 30 years. The data obtained from the literature were collected from PubMed, SciELO, and Google Scholar websites, while the clinical data were obtained from the Teaching Clinic of the Dentistry Postgraduate Department. This study was aimed at reporting a clinical case of conventional endodontic retreatment in Tooth 21 with external apical resorption. Initially, periapical radiographs and cone beam computed tomography were requested from the unit for better assessment and management of the case. Results: The treatment was carried out with bioceramic cement; in the present case, its use combined with good operative protocols was effective, using simple tools for a successful treatment, ensuring the patient's well-being and quality of life. Conclusions: The retreatment on Tooth 21, using the existing biological and technological conditions, was effective in generating periodontal health for the associated tissues.

Indexed as

cone beam computed tomographyendodontic retreatmentexternal apical resorptionfailure

Identifiers

PMID41104348
PMCPMC12527599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.