ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Nurse-Physician Communication During Interdisciplinary Team Rounding: An Observational Study in Internal Medicine.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions of Secure Messaging and Patient Safety: Results of an Interprofessional Survey.Hospital pediatrics · 2026Article
- Comprehensive nursing intervention improves psychological outcomes, sleep quality, pain, and coping in patients with comorbid depression and thoracolumbar compression fracture.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Interdisciplinary team rounding improves communication in hospital settings by bringing together multiple disciplines to collaborate on a patient's plan of care. While prior research has demonstrated the benefits, the relationship between time spent at the bedside and the delivery of key clinical content remains less understood. This study examined whether physician bedside rounding time and nurse-physician interaction time influenced discussions of care plan elements and engagement of care team members. Methods: We conducted an observational descriptive study at a quaternary academic medical center. Using a standardized observation tool, trained student observers recorded data from a sample of 1007 patient encounters during morning internal medicine rounds. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between bedside rounding time, nurse-physician interaction time, and discussions of the plan of the day, overall hospitalization goals, and anticipated discharge, as well as nurse and patient/family involvement. Results: Of the 1007 encounters, 64.7% (n=652) included a nurse-physician interaction, with a mean interaction time of 6.1 minutes (SD=4.8). Longer bedside rounding time increased the likelihood of discussions about hospitalization goals (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.09-2.54) and anticipated discharge (OR=1.25, 95% CI: 1.02-1.54). Longer nurse-physician interaction time significantly increased the likelihood of nurse involvement across all three discussion topics and was also associated with greater patient/family engagement. Conclusion: Longer bedside rounding and structured nurse-physician interaction both enhanced communication during rounds. Nurse-physician interaction time was the stronger predictor of inclusive discussions, underscoring the importance of structured approaches to engage nurses in interdisciplinary rounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.