ArticleCase reports in genetics2025
Emanuel Syndrome: A Case Report With Isolated Nuchal Translucency Thickening.
Article in Case reports in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emanuel syndrome is a rare chromosomal disorder characterized by severe developmental disability and variable clinical manifestations. Although congenital anomalies are relatively common, there is no pathognomonic prenatal pattern. In some cases, structural defects are absent or not detectable prenatally, making the potential role of soft ultrasound markers particularly relevant. Case Presentation: We report a case of Emanuel syndrome in which no structural malformations were identified prenatally. First-trimester ultrasound revealed an isolated increased nuchal translucency of 3.2 mm. Postnatally, the infant exhibited severe hypotonia, dysmorphic features, and profound developmental delay, but no gross structural defects were observed. Cytogenetic and FISH analyses confirmed an additional der(22)t(11; 22) chromosome inherited from the mother. Discussion: A review of the limited literature on first-trimester findings suggests that increased nuchal translucency has been observed in several cases of Emanuel syndrome, although the available data remain insufficient to assess predictive value. Nevertheless, the recurrence of this observation across independent reports indicates that NT enlargement may warrant attention as a potential prenatal marker. Conclusion: While current evidence is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions, this case highlights that isolated NT thickening may represent the only prenatal sign of Emanuel syndrome. Evaluation in larger cohorts and future prospective studies will be essential to determine the sensitivity and specificity of this marker for early diagnosis of the syndrome and the timely identification of balanced translocation carriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.