Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104258›Full record

ArticleCase reports in genetics2025

Emanuel Syndrome: A Case Report With Isolated Nuchal Translucency Thickening.

Bondarenko Maya, Nikolenko Marharyta, Dutchak Anastasiia, Kupchak Iryna, Ivanova Irina, Arbuzova Svitlana

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bondarenko MayaDepartment of Medical Biology and Medical Genetics, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, 2 Galitska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk 76000, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-4433
Nikolenko MarharytaEastern-Ukrainian Center for Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Mariupol & Kyiv, 23 Kopernika Str., Kyiv 02000, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0231-7496
Dutchak AnastasiiaDepartment of Medical Biology and Medical Genetics, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, 2 Galitska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk 76000, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2124-5536
Kupchak IrynaDepartment of Medical Biology and Medical Genetics, Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, 2 Galitska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk 76000, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4833-7134
Ivanova IrinaEastern-Ukrainian Center for Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Mariupol & Kyiv, 23 Kopernika Str., Kyiv 02000, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9927-0626
Arbuzova SvitlanaEastern-Ukrainian Center for Medical Genetics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Mariupol & Kyiv, 23 Kopernika Str., Kyiv 02000, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-1067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Emanuel syndrome is a rare chromosomal disorder characterized by severe developmental disability and variable clinical manifestations. Although congenital anomalies are relatively common, there is no pathognomonic prenatal pattern. In some cases, structural defects are absent or not detectable prenatally, making the potential role of soft ultrasound markers particularly relevant. Case Presentation: We report a case of Emanuel syndrome in which no structural malformations were identified prenatally. First-trimester ultrasound revealed an isolated increased nuchal translucency of 3.2 mm. Postnatally, the infant exhibited severe hypotonia, dysmorphic features, and profound developmental delay, but no gross structural defects were observed. Cytogenetic and FISH analyses confirmed an additional der(22)t(11; 22) chromosome inherited from the mother. Discussion: A review of the limited literature on first-trimester findings suggests that increased nuchal translucency has been observed in several cases of Emanuel syndrome, although the available data remain insufficient to assess predictive value. Nevertheless, the recurrence of this observation across independent reports indicates that NT enlargement may warrant attention as a potential prenatal marker. Conclusion: While current evidence is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions, this case highlights that isolated NT thickening may represent the only prenatal sign of Emanuel syndrome. Evaluation in larger cohorts and future prospective studies will be essential to determine the sensitivity and specificity of this marker for early diagnosis of the syndrome and the timely identification of balanced translocation carriers.

Indexed as

Emanuel syndromenuchal translucencyprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID41104258
PMCPMC12527601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.