ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR
Preparation and in vitro Immunoreactivity of
Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Objectives: To optimize the preparation process of Methods: The RRPL were prepared using the reverse-phase evaporation method, with encapsulation efficiency (EE) as the primary evaluation criterion. An orthogonal test was employed to optimize the preparation parameters. Various characteristics of RRPL were assessed, including morphology, particle size, Polydispersity Index (PDI), zeta potential, cumulative release rate in vitro, and stability. The immunological effects of RRPL were evaluated through cellular assays involving mouse spleen lymphocytes, peritoneal macrophages, and bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs). Results: The RRPL demonstrated an EE of approximately 81.96%, an average drug loading (DL) capacity of 13.86%, a particle size of 124.00 nm, a PDI of 0.23, and a zeta potential of -12.97 mV. The formulated RRPL exhibited high EE and DL capacity, alongside favorable slow-release properties and stability. These enhancements led to improved drug bioavailability and prolonged duration of action. Furthermore, RRPL significantly promoted the proliferation of spleen lymphocytes; enhanced the phagocytic activity of peritoneal macrophages; increased the secretion of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and interferon (IFN)-γ; activated immature BMDCs; and induced the maturation of BMDCs, resulting in increased production of IL-12p70 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Conclusions: This study successfully developed RRPL that markedly enhance immune cell activation compared with RRP. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for further exploration and development of these liposomal formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.