ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences
Evaluation of
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vitamin D, widely recognised for its role in bone health and immune function, has recently garnered significant interest for its potential impact on male reproductive health. Several studies have suggested that adequate Vitamin D levels may be associated with improved sperm quality and, consequently, enhanced male fertility. Aim: The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different concentrations of Vitamin D on sperm parameters Settings and Design: This is a prospective Materials and Methods: Sperm samples were incubated with different concentrations of Vitamin D (1.625 × 10 Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 27.0.1) with analysis of variance. Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and Results: A significant improvement in sperm motility was observed at a concentration of 1.625 × 10 Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.