Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist versus Fixed Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation in

Background: Investigators have compared progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) and conventional stimulations in multiple studies, however, with contrasting observations with respect to Aim: The primary aim of this study was to compare IVF cycle outcomes in terms of oocyte yield, maturation rate, fertilisation rate, blastulation rate, implantation and cumulative pregnancy rate between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and fixed PPOS protocol. The secondary aim was to compare the extent of pituitary suppression as reflected by serum LH before final oocyte maturation between both the protocols. Settings and Design: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Materials and Methods: All ovarian stimulation cycles, either performed as GnRH-antagonist or as fixed PPOS, between 1 Statistical Analysis Used: Statistical tests applied were Student's Results: The total number of cycles was 189, of which 87 (46.03%) cycles were in the GnRH antagonist group and 102 (53.96%) in the PPOS group. The groups were similar with respect to age, anti-Müllerian hormone, body mass index as well as total gonadotropin consumption. There was no significant difference observed for the number of oocytes ( Conclusion: IVF cycle outcomes with respect to oocyte yield, maturation rate, fertilisation rate, blastulation rate, implantation rates and cumulative pregnancy were comparable between GnRH antagonist and PPOS cycles. Furthermore, the extent of pituitary suppression, reflected by the serum LH levels before final oocyte maturation, was similar between the groups as observed in our analysis. However, these findings need to be validated by prospective studies or randomised trials with equal patient division.