Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Mesh use does not affect the outcome of elective open hernia repair in cirrhotic patients.

Fuat Aksoy, Burak Buyukpolat, Ozkan Balcin, Volkan Polatkan, Ekrem Kaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fuat AksoyDepartment of Surgery, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Burak BuyukpolatDepartment of Surgery, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Ozkan BalcinDepartment of Bioistatistic, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Volkan PolatkanDepartment of Surgery, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Ekrem KayaDepartment of Surgery, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes of elective and emergency umbilical and inguinal hernia repairs in cirrhotic patients, focusing on the controversial use of mesh and its relationship with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with open surgical hernia repair on cirrhosis between January 2007 and December 2022 was performed. Patients were divided into 2 main groups: those with and without mesh. Demographic characteristics, perioperative factors, postoperative complications, recurrence, and first 90-day mortality rates were compared. Results: Sixty-two patients were included in the study. Mesh use was more common in inguinal hernia repairs, while mesh-free repairs were predominant in umbilical hernias. No significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between the groups, but comorbidities were more common in the mesh group. Ascites and emergency vs. elective status did not significantly affect the decision to use mesh. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of recurrence. A positive correlation was determined between higher MELD scores and 90-day mortality, regardless of mesh use. ( Conclusions: Mesh can be safely used in hernia repairs in cirrhotic patients with appropriate perioperative management. However, it should be kept in mind that mortality may increase as the MELD score increases.

Indexed as

cirrhosisherniahernia (inguinal)hernia umbilicalmesh

Identifiers

PMID41104175
PMCPMC12521112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.