ArticleBioactive materials2026
Topology-optimized melt-electrowritten PCL patch for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functionalized bio-patches for intra-abdominal applications.iScience · 2026Review
- Angiogenesis-facilitating and inflammation-modulating SIS-based patches coupled with functional peptides for abdominal wall repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abdominal wall patches are clinically essential for treating abdominal defects or hernias, with mechanical strength representing a critical requirement. Therefore, rational scaffold design and fabrication methods are crucial for achieving optimal performance. This study introduces an innovative approach to the design of scaffolds for abdominal wall repair, using topology optimization and melt electrowriting (MEW). Through topology optimization, we provided a systematic, data-driven basis for scaffold design. We further refined the scaffold structure to enhance print efficiency and continuity, and successfully implemented MEW as fabrication technology, marking its first application in abdominal repair. Mechanical testing revealed that the topology-optimized scaffold achieved abdominal tensile strength of 1.85 ± 0.02 N/cm, 39 % superior to conventional designs. Subsequent biological assessments - including fibroblast proliferation and alignment analyses - showed that collagen coating significantly enhanced cell attachment and proliferation, especially in multi-layer (300 layers) scaffolds, maintaining diameters of 11.34 ± 0.67 μm throughout the depth. Finally,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.