ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2025
Standardized bilateral thoracic ultrasound image comparison as a tool for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: a pilot exploratory study.
Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Pneumothorax is a potentially life-threatening condition whose diagnosis can be challenging. Ultrasound chest examination is generally fast and user-friendly, but in non-expert hands or with uncooperative patients, it may still be difficult and time-consuming. Adding another tool to support the suspicion of pneumothorax might be useful, potentially enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of standard ultrasound chest examination. We evaluated the feasibility of standardized bilateral ultrasound image comparison as a potential new tool for pneumothorax diagnosis. Materials and methods: We enrolled 60 subjects (30 with pneumothorax and 30 controls) and collected bilateral ultrasound images of their chests (each image contained one frame from the left lung and one from the right lung). Ten physicians (eight blinded to diagnosis) divided into five groups according to expertise evaluated the images for potential grayscale differences and/or horizontal artifacts between the two frames. All images were then analyzed with image analysis software for grayscale pixel assessment (one sub-analysis for the entire area under the pleural line, one for a 100-pixel-wide rectangle under the pleural line). Results: All clinicians achieved good results in terms of diagnostic accuracy and inter-operator reliability, even those unexperienced in ultrasound. Mean, range, and median grayscale pixel ratio between the pneumothorax side and the healthy side in a single patient proved to be the most reliable parameters, reaching excellent sensitivity and specificity. Combining these parameters proved to be an excellent diagnostic tool (ROC area under curve = 1.00, Conclusions: Standardized bilateral thoracic ultrasound image comparison may be a potential new tool for the diagnosis of pneumothorax.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.