ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
Analysis of Mucosal Wave and Vibratory Patterns in Vocally Healthy Children and Adults.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of Mucosal Wave and Vibratory Patterns in Vocally Healthy Children and Adults.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a systematic investigation and comparison of the mucosal wave of vocal fold oscillations, the longitudinal anterior-posterior (AP) vibratory patterns of opening and closing, and posterior glottal gap in vocally healthy children (girls and boys) and adults (women and men). Methods: High-speed videoendoscopy (HSV) recordings of the sustained phonations of 40 subjects (10 men, 10 women, 10 boys, and 10 girls) were analyzed. For each recording, three sections of stable sustained phonation were selected. Two experts rated independently the anterior and posterior commissure points, the mucosal wave, and the AP vibratory patterns during the opening and closing phases of vocal fold vibration. A third rater mediated a consensus. Statistical significance between participant groups was evaluated using Pearson's chi-square test and post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Mucosal wave amplitude was highest in children, whereas adult males exhibited lower amplitudes ( Conclusion: This study identified age- and gender-related differences in vocal fold vibration. The findings offer key reference data for age-appropriate clinical visual-perceptual voice assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.