ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Informal Caregivers in Transitional Hospital-to-Home Care for Older People: Addressing Gaps in Pre-Discharge Collaboration for Enhanced Patient Outcomes.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Supporting Family Caregivers in an Aging Society: The Need for Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Interventions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With aging populations worldwide, informal caregivers (ICs) play an essential role in transitional hospital-to-home care for older people, providing essential first-line support, clinical assistance, emotional care, and crucial coordination of care. However, their involvement in discharge planning remains insufficiently recognized, potentially compromising patient safety and continuity of care. Despite their vital contributions and growing policy initiatives, ICs' involvement in hospital discharge planning remains insufficiently recognized. This lack of structured integration leads to significant gaps in communication, education, and collaborative care planning-factors that can compromise patient safety, disrupt continuity of care, and increase caregiver burden. ICs often report feeling unheard and excluded from key decisions, which contributes to adverse outcomes for both patients and ICs. Addressing these gaps requires comprehensive systemic changes aimed at formalizing the role of ICs in professional training, hospital discharge protocols, and integrating ICs meaningfully into care decision-making processes. This perspectives article provides an overview of the current state of IC involvement in transitional care, reflects on its relevance among healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers, and explores the implications for patient safety and health outcomes. Drawing on evidence-based models such as the Transitional Care Model and Better Outcomes for Older people through Safe Transitions, the article discusses key strategies to enhance IC participation. These include raising awareness among professional caregivers, improving communication and information transfer, formally recognizing and integrating ICs as care partners, and leveraging technology and support systems tailored to their needs. By fostering structured partnerships and collaborative approaches with ICs, healthcare systems can improve the quality and safety of transitional care while alleviating caregiver burden and promoting better long-term health trajectories for older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.