Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104107›Full record

ArticleJournal of health equity2025

Advancing equity in cancer care: a pilot explanatory mixed methods study of a racially, ethnically, and linguistically concordant model of patient navigation.

Ashlyn Tom, Citlali Gomez-Acosta, Vida Henderson, Jean McDougall, Jason A Mendoza, Elizabeth Carosso, Eliza Brumer Cohn, Wendy E Barrington, Liszet Bigelow-Chavez, Yaw A Nyame and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health equity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ashlyn TomDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Citlali Gomez-AcostaFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vida HendersonDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jean McDougallOffice of Community Outreach and Engagement, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jason A MendozaDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elizabeth CarossoOffice of Community Outreach and Engagement, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eliza Brumer CohnFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wendy E BarringtonDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Liszet Bigelow-ChavezOffice of Community Outreach and Engagement, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yaw A NyameDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
K Casey LionDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Biobehavioral Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program (BCPT)T32CA092408 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Margaret A Hannon · 2016 to 2026
$2.3M
Cellular and Molecular Requirements for Medulloblastoma TumorigenesisF31CA157045 · NCI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, DESMOND A · 2010 to 2012
$61k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA157045NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NCI NIH HHS T32 CA092408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disparities in cancer outcomes persist among systemically marginalized patients. A new racially, ethnically, or linguistically concordant (RELC) model of patient navigation (PN) was piloted at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center in 2019. An explanatory mixed-methods observational study assessed patient-centered outcomes of RELC PN, traditional PN, and no PN. Patients from these models completed surveys at baseline and follow-up to measure changes in satisfaction, discrimination, resilience, stress, trust, and discussion of clinical trials. Interviews with patients receiving RELC PN were analyzed using thematic analysis. A total of 118 participants completed surveys. Satisfaction with care improved by 4.2 points (SD 7.0) on an 18-item 5-point Likert scale for those receiving RELC navigation, with no change in traditional or no PN groups. Discrimination based on race dropped from 40% (

Indexed as

cancer disparitieshealth equitylinguistic concordancenavigator concordancePatient navigationracial concordance

Identifiers

PMID41104107
PMCPMC12525726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.