ArticleActa medica Philippina2025
Traumatic Peripheral Nerve Injury in the Philippines: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Silk-Derived 3D-Bioprinted Scaffolds for Neural Repair and Nerve Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- First 100 brachial plexus surgeries in Angola: Population impact and lessons learned.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic peripheral nerve injury (TPNI) is a debilitating condition that may result in significant disability. There is variability in the epidemiology, clinical profile, and mechanism of injury worldwide, but data for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as the Philippines are sparse. Objective: We aimed to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients who sustained TPNI in our center. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients referred for TPNI at our institution from 2013 to 2019. Data on demographics, clinical features, etiology, surgical management, and status on last follow-up were collected. Results: Forty-four patients with injuries to 62 peripheral nerves were included in the cohort, which had a strong male predilection (98%). The mean age at diagnosis was 35.5 years, with 78% of patients aged between 16-45 years. The most common etiologies were laceration due to sharp objects (39%), stab wound (23%), hacking injury (14%), and vehicular crash (14%). In terms of mechanism of nerve injury, the most common was sharp laceration (80%), followed by stretch injury/nerve injury in continuity (14%). The most commonly injured nerves were the ulnar (36%) and median nerves (32%), more often on the right side (66%). Nerve repair surgery was performed in 80% of cases. Conclusion: TPNIs in a tertiary center in the Philippines most commonly involved young males in the working age group and were caused by occupational and domestic accidents. Appropriate surgical management of TPNI is feasible in low resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.