ReviewCureus2025
A Review of the Management of Nephrolithiasis in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a chronic hereditary disorder and a major cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Urolithiasis is a frequent complication in ADPKD and may contribute to the accelerated decline in renal function. The presence of complex calyceal anatomy, impaired renal function, and associated comorbidities makes stone management particularly challenging in this population. We conducted a narrative review of the literature to explore the underlying reasons for the high incidence of nephrolithiasis in ADPKD, as well as current approaches to management. A targeted literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for articles published up to February 2025 using the keywords "ADPKD", "nephrolithiasis", "kidney stones," "urolithiasis," "management", and "treatment". Only English-language articles involving human subjects were considered. Original studies, meta-analyses, narrative, and systematic reviews relevant to nephrolithiasis in ADPKD were included. Conference abstracts, editorials, and non-peer-reviewed sources were excluded. Both medical and surgical treatment modalities were evaluated, with attention to reported success rates and complication profiles. Although this is a narrative review and no formal risk of bias assessment was performed, emphasis was placed on including high-quality studies and widely cited literature. Key findings were synthesized thematically to provide an overview of current understanding and management of nephrolithiasis in ADPKD. Small sample sizes and significant heterogeneity in study design, patient selection, and treatment protocols limit available evidence. While the general principles of stone management are similar to those in non-ADPKD patients, therapeutic decisions must be tailored to stone size, location, composition, renal function, and anatomical considerations. Based on the literature, we propose a treatment algorithm to support clinical decision-making. Standardization of management strategies in ADPKD remains an unmet need. Larger, well-designed studies are required to establish evidence-based guidelines for optimal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.