ReviewCureus2025
Preventing Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Infants: A Comparative Review of Nirsevimab and Maternal Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F (RSVpreF) Vaccination.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of lower respiratory tract disease in early infancy. Preventive options have recently expanded beyond selective palivizumab use to two population-level strategies: infant administration of the long-acting monoclonal antibody nirsevimab and maternal immunization with an RSV prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine during late pregnancy. This review synthesizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety, durability, and programmatic considerations of both approaches, with attention to comparative strengths and real-world implementation. We outline clinical trial findings, early post-licensure effectiveness and safety data, and health-economic considerations relevant to diverse health systems. We also discuss limitations of the evidence base and propose priorities for surveillance and comparative research to guide policy decisions. The goal is to provide clinicians and policymakers with a concise, practice-oriented appraisal of how these strategies can be integrated to reduce RSV burden in the first months of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.