ReviewAIMS neuroscience2025
Persistent primitive trigeminal artery in stroke: A review and clinical insights.
Review in AIMS neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence of basilar artery variants: a systematic review with meta-analysis of radiological studies.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The persistent primitive trigeminal artery is the most common remnant of the embryonic carotid-basilar connection. While its anatomy is well documented, its clinical significance in strokes remains debated. Some studies suggest it predisposes ischemia through altered hemodynamics, whereas others report a protective role via collateral circulation. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the anatomy, imaging, and clinical implications of the persistent primitive trigeminal artery in strokes. A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to March 2025 identified relevant case reports, imaging studies, and clinical series. The artery typically arises from the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery, courses alongside the trigeminal nerve, and terminates in the posterior circulation. Classification systems describe variations in its termination, course, and vascular supply. Magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiography are key diagnostic tools, each with their advantages and limitations. Evidence shows two opposing roles: either as a conduit for steal phenomena, turbulent flow, and thromboembolism or as a collateral channel that preserves cerebral perfusion during carotid or vertebrobasilar occlusion. Understanding this vessel's anatomy and potential hemodynamic effects are critical for accurate diagnoses, risk assessments, and treatment planning. Its dual nature highlights the importance of individualized evaluations and further research to clarify its role in strokes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.