ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Traditional medicine, environmental exposures, and cultural practices in cancer risk: insights from low- and middle-income countries.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cancer and Environmental Xenobiotics: Mechanisms, Controversies, and Innovations.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is a growing public health concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), influenced by cultural practices, environmental exposures, and dependence on traditional medicine in addition to biological risk factors. Evidence from peer-reviewed publications published between 2010 and 2025 was combined in this narrative review. According to studies, traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) is used by 35% to 79% of cancer patients in LMICs, which frequently delays biomedical treatment and complicates care. Over 2.4 billion people use biomass fuels for household air pollution (HAP), which has been associated with a two- to three-fold increased risk of lung cancer, especially in women. Furthermore, tobacco smoking contributes to about 2.7 million new cases of cancer in less developed areas each year, highlighting ongoing exposure to avoidable dangers. Findings show that the cancer burden in LMICs is further exacerbated by poor food storage, alcohol use, pesticide exposure, unregulated consumer chemicals, and stigma. These cultural and environmental factors must be addressed in preventative initiatives in addition to biological therapy. Strengthening T&CM regulations, enhancing food safety, upholding alcohol and tobacco legislation, lowering exposures at work and in the home, and introducing culturally-based education to dispel stigma and myths are among the top priorities. This is a narrative review rather than a systematic one; the goal is to map thematic evidence throughout Africa, Asia, and Latin America, providing insights for policy design. Integrated, context-specific, and community-driven approaches are required to eliminate inequities and promote equitable cancer control in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.