ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Personalized sports recommendation systems using robotic-assisted techniques in urologic oncology recovery.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The integration of robotic-assisted techniques in urologic oncology recovery has significantly improved surgical precision and patient outcomes. However, postoperative rehabilitation remains a crucial challenge, necessitating innovative approaches for enhancing physical recovery and quality of life. Personalized sports recommendation systems have emerged as a promising solution, leveraging sports analytics, machine learning, and biomechanical modeling to tailor rehabilitation exercises. Traditional methods rely on generalized rehabilitation protocols, often failing to consider individual patient conditions, recovery progress, and biomechanical constraints. These limitations hinder optimal rehabilitation and prolong recovery times. Methods: To address these challenges, we propose a novel framework integrating robotic-assisted assessment with personalized sports analytics. Our approach utilizes a Dynamic Sports Performance Network (DSPN), which combines spatiotemporal data analysis, reinforcement learning, and real-time feedback mechanisms to optimize exercise recommendations. By incorporating multi-agent learning and predictive modeling, the system adapts rehabilitation plans based on patient performance, ensuring a tailored and effective recovery process. The system can integrate wearable sensor data and EMG signals to further refine exercise precision and monitor muscular responses in real time. Results: Experimental evaluations demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms conventional rehabilitation strategies, offering higher precision in exercise recommendations, improved adherence rates, and enhanced recovery efficiency. Discussion: This research provides a new direction in robotic-assisted rehabilitation, bridging the gap between sports science, intelligent systems, and urologic oncology recovery through interdisciplinary innovation and patient-centered design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.