ArticleCureus2025
Time-Domain Analysis of Chest Impedance for Venous Air Embolism Detection: An Open-Source Software Tool and Single-Cadaver Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous air embolism remains one of the leading intraoperative neurosurgical complications and causes of intraoperative neurosurgical death. While transesophageal echocardiogram and precordial Doppler are commonly used in neurosurgical cases to detect entrained air, both have significant limitations, and neither tool has been adapted to automated notification. We theorize that (1) higher frequency variations (relative to the respiratory cycle), and in severe circumstances, (2) relatively non-varying increases in chest impedance can detect venous air emboli using non-invasive or minimally invasive continuous techniques. This would allow for automated reporting of these findings, which would be of use to anesthesia providers. The current tools (primarily echocardiogram and precordial Doppler) lack the ability to provide automated or centralized alarm functions and can be technically difficult, more costly to perform, and provide non-continuous information. A proof-of-concept open-source software tool has been developed to allow for collaborative development of this technique, and preliminary testing has been performed on a previously described cadaveric model for venous air embolism, with a single cadaver as a pilot study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.