ReviewCureus2025
Use of Topical Antibiotics in Open Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of topical vancomycin in preventing surgical site infection following fracture surgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
- Conflict wounds and antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review on local antimicrobials to prevent infection after extremity open fracture.BMJ military health · 2026Pooled it
- Topical antibiotic powder reduces fracture-related infections in pelvic and lower limb fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Pooled it
- Antimicrobial-laden PerOssal beads display in vitro inhibition and killing of extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria associated with conflict wounds in Ukraine.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open fractures are associated with a high risk of surgical site infection (SSI) due to impaired vascularity, extensive soft tissue injury, and contamination. Despite prompt systemic antibiotic administration being the standard of care, infection rates remain substantial. The adjunctive use of topical antibiotics has been proposed to further reduce this risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Six studies (one randomized controlled trial and five cohort studies) involving 2,982 patients were included, of whom 758 received adjunctive topical antibiotics. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significantly lower SSI rate in patients receiving both systemic and topical antibiotics compared with systemic antibiotics alone (7.26% vs. 10.12%; p=0.0197). No significant difference was observed between monotherapy with vancomycin and dual therapy with vancomycin plus tobramycin (p=0.0602). No increase in systemic adverse events was reported, although one study noted a higher incidence of wound-healing complications with vancomycin powder. Adjunctive topical antibiotic administration was associated with a statistically significant reduction in SSI rates following open fractures. However, heterogeneity in study design, outcome definitions, and interventions limits the strength and generalizability of the evidence. Large, high-quality randomized trials are needed to establish optimal regimens, evaluate long-term safety, and determine cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.