ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
Risk of diabetes mellitus with olanzapine compared to clozapine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of olanzapine on diabetes related index in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- Pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: Japanese Expert Consensus 2025.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Antipsychotic Drugs and the Risk of Diabetic Complications: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Risk of diabetes mellitus with olanzapine compared to clozapine: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Olanzapine and clozapine are second-generation antipsychotics commonly associated with metabolic side effects. In Japan, olanzapine is designated as "principally contraindicated" for patients with diabetes, while clozapine is "used with caution," despite similar pharmacological profiles. This study compares the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus between olanzapine and clozapine using adjusted effect estimates from observational studies. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published between 2000 and 2025 that reported diabetes-related outcomes in patients treated with olanzapine or clozapine. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were synthesized using a random-effects model. In the absence of direct comparative data, the Bucher method was employed for indirect comparisons using a shared comparator. Results: Sixteen studies were included. Meta-analysis of seven HR-based studies revealed a significantly lower risk of new-onset diabetes in the olanzapine group compared to clozapine (pooled HR = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-0.85). On the other hand, the odds ratio (OR)-based analysis (nine studies) showed no significant difference (pooled OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.66-1.09). Sensitivity analysis with only aORs and subgroup analysis by follow-up duration revealed no significant differences. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that olanzapine is associated with a lower or at least comparable risk of new-onset diabetes relative to clozapine. Considering that olanzapine is more tightly regulated than clozapine in clinical practice in Japan, these findings indicate the need for further confirmatory studies and accumulation of robust evidence to inform potential regulatory reclassification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.