Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103785›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

An Iterative quantum chaotic security method design for big data deployments using a multi-model framework for key generation, threat modelling, and anomaly-resilient validation.

Archana Kotangale, Meesala Sudhir Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Archana KotangalePhD Research Scholar Department of Computer Science and Engineering Sandip University, Nashik 422213, Maharashtra, India.
Meesala Sudhir KumarProfessor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sandip University, Nashik 422213, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The forecast of big data is becoming exponential in major sectors, which further points toward a necessity for strong, scalable, and intelligent security frameworks. The existing mechanisms are failing to handle high-volume, high-velocity settings due to static cryptographic structures, limited entropy, and inadequate adaptability towards developing threats. On the other hand, the most widely used traditional models are often threat-class dependent, thereby lacking real-time resilience assessment coupled with dynamic key management. This paper puts forth a proposal of a novel multi-layered big data security framework partly driven by QSSS and Adaptive Intelligence. It integrates advanced entropy-based key generation, dynamic threat modeling, hybrid blockchain integrity, adaptive encryption-compression, and intelligent intrusion detection. All these layers ensure end-to-end confidentiality, integrity, and anomaly resilience. Empirical evaluations show that detection has improved significantly, with intrusion detection exceeding 95 % purity, while tampering detection reached over 96 %, and storage optimization reached 60 %. The proposed framework embodies a next-generation solution for securing adaptable and scalable big-data infrastructures in high-supportability environments, where changing threats call for continuing adaptation. Multi-layered architecture combining chaos-driven entropy and adaptive intelligence. Integrated protection ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and resilience. Scalable design tailored for dynamic, high-growth data ecosystems.

Indexed as

AnalysisAnomaly DetectionBig data securityBlockchain EncryptionDynamic key generationQuantum chaotic maps

Identifiers

PMID41103785
PMCPMC12523061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.