Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103768›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Policy principles for sustainable and just land systems.

Rachael Garrett, Patrick Meyfroidt, Ariane de Bremond, Ariani Wartenberg, Lindsay Barbieri, Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Emmanuel Acheampong, Thomas Addoah, Matthew Adeleye, Peter Alexander and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Rachael GarrettDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1DB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6171-263X
Patrick MeyfroidtGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1047-9794
Ariane de BremondGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0924-6053
Ariani WartenbergGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-5005
Lindsay BarbieriGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8495-6402
Álvaro Fernández-LlamazaresDepartment of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology (BABVE), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7813-0222
Emmanuel AcheampongDepartment of Silviculture and Forest Management, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-1821
Thomas AddoahDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1DB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8333-1283
Matthew AdeleyeDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1DB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6034-5807
Peter AlexanderSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6010-1186
Joyce BrandãoDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1DB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2241-5663
David Anthony CoomesConservation Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8261-2582
Erle C EllisGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2006-3362
J FajardoDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1DB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0990-9718
Johanna JacobiDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8006, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3432-4938
Melissa LeachDepartment of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3RF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1293-6848
Sharachchandra LeleGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7037-089X
Aymara Llanque ZontaHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig 04318, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9290-3980
Joss Lyons-WhiteDepartment of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1DB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-0241
Adrian MartinSchool of Global Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2916-7712
Peter MesserliGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0286-6348
E J Milner-GullandDepartment of Biology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3EL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0324-2710
Daniel MüllerGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-0718
Morena MillsCentre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London SW7 1NE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9865-0770
Pauline Nantongo KalundaEnvironmental Conservation Trust of Uganda (ECOTRUST), Kampala, Uganda.
Unai PascualGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-236X
Ximena RuedaSchool of Management, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5991-4048
Casey RyanGlobal Land Programme, College Park 20740, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1802-0128
Siddappa SettyCentre for Environment and Development, Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru 560064, India.
Thu Thuy PhamCollege of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University, Bedford Park 5042, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0088-7396
Cecilia ZagariaFarming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-4370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land systems are the nexus of many global sustainability and justice challenges. Here we present eight guiding principles (P1-8) for improved land system policies following the heuristic stages of a policy cycle. The principles are as follows: embrace recognitional justice (P1), be politically strategic (P2), consider multiple policy goals (P3), address systemic issues (P4), take an integrative scope (P5), foster co-development (P6), adopt clear and monitorable targets (P7) and integrate diagnostic and adaptive capacities (P8). We then explore how well policies align with these principles in two globally relevant cases (land-based climate mitigation and biodiversity-friendly agriculture). In both cases, we find that when policies align poorly with the principles at the agenda-setting stage, there is further misalignment at the policy formulation stage. In the instances when recognitional justice is embraced at the onset, policies subsequently integrate more diverse goals and co-development, but they insufficiently consider political strategy and struggle to handle system complexity. Nonetheless, we identify promising policy mixes that provide benefits to multiple actors, integrate multiple goals, take an integrative scope and have strong monitoring and adaptation, aligning well with multiple principles. Further investigation of these principles could reveal promising policy pathways for land systems.

Indexed as

climateconservationfoodgovernancescience–policysustainability transitionstransformation

Identifiers

PMID41103768
PMCPMC12522160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.