ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Leg compliance is required to explain the ground reaction force patterns and speed ranges in different gaits.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leg compliance is required to explain the ground reaction force patterns and speed ranges in different gaits.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two simple models-vaulting over stiff legs and rebounding over compliant legs-are employed to describe the mechanics of legged locomotion. It is agreed that compliant legs are necessary for describing running, and that leg compliance is also present during walking. Stiff legs continue to be employed to model walking under the assumption that the compliance of the leg during walking is low enough to be considered stiff. Here we study gait choice and walk-to-run transition in a biped with compliance and show that the principles underlying gait choice and transition are completely different from stiff legs. Two findings underpin our conclusions: First, at the same speed, step length and stance duration, multiple gaits that differ in the number of times the leg expands and contracts during a single stance are possible. Among them, humans and other animals choose the (normal) gait with M-shaped vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF) not just because of energy considerations but also constraints from forces. Second, the transition from walking to running occurs because of three factors: vGRF minimum at mid-stance characteristic of normal walking, synchronization of horizontal and vertical motions during single support, and velocity redirection during the double support. The insight above required an analytical approximation of the double spring-loaded pendulum (DSLIP) model describing the intricate oscillatory dynamics that relate single and double support phases. Additionally, we also examined DSLIP as a quantitative model for locomotion and conclude that DSLIP speed range is limited. However, insights gleaned from the analytical treatment of DSLIP are general and will inform the construction of more accurate models of walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.