ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Oxytocin administration to clinicians in acute psychiatric care settings: a feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Oxytocin (OT) has been previously found to facilitate therapeutic outcomes when administered to patients. Recent evidence suggests that therapist's OT levels similarly influence clinicians' ability to respond to patients in an empathic and responsive manner. However, no study previously assessed the impact of OT administration to clinicians treating patients in acute settings. This preliminary feasibility study investigated the applicability and trends of effects of OT administration to clinicians performing triage assessment in a public psychiatric emergency room, while focusing on perceived empathy and quality of the therapeutic encounter. Methods: Three clinicians were double-blindingly administered with intranasal OT at one day, and saline placebo (PLC) at a different day. The patients they met (N = 16) provided self-reports on the clinician's empathy (BLRI), the quality of the session (SEQ), and their level of psychological distress (HSCL-11). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare ratings across the two conditions. Results: Patients reported significantly deeper and more valuable meeting with the clinicians following OT administration to clinicians (S = 32.0, p = 0.0398) as well as significantly lower levels of distress (S = 70.5, p = 0.0343). Clinicians perceived empathy was higher after OT administration compared to PLC, however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (S= 38, p = 0.1675). Conclusion: Although these results should be interpreted with caution due to the preliminary nature of the study, they highlight the potential contribution of clinician's OT in facilitation the therapeutic process in acute settings, and call for further investigation in larger, controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.