Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103736›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Collaborative challenges during transition of patients with severe depression from secondary mental health services to primary care and opportunities for improvement - a qualitative study.

Anne Sofie Aggestrup, Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard, Klaus Martiny, Annette Sofie Davidsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne Sofie AggestrupCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marius Brostrøm KousgaardThe Research Unit for and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Klaus MartinyCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annette Sofie DavidsenThe Research Unit for and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with severe depression are treated across primary and secondary healthcare and receive employment support from municipal caseworkers (CWs). However, collaboration during the transition from outpatient secondary mental health services to primary care is often insufficient, increasing the risk of relapse. Limited knowledge exists on how health professionals (general practitioners (GPs), mental health professionals (MHPs) and social medicine physicians), CWs, and patients perceive barriers - and, in particular, how collaboration could be improved and relapse prevented. We aimed to explore barriers to cross-sectoral collaboration during the transition of patients with severe depression from outpatient secondary mental health services to primary care, and to generate ideas from health professionals, CWs, and patients to enhance this collaboration and contribute to preventing relapse. Materials and methods: This qualitative study included fieldwork observations, interviews, focus groups, and workshops with 25 health professionals, seven CWs, and four recently discharged patients. Data was analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and descriptive methods. Results: Four themes were found: Insufficient communication from mental health services caused challenges for GPs in the handover phase; Different goals between professionals resulted in mutual mistrust and blame; Patients felt left on their own after discharge due to a lack of coordination and support services and; Ideas for improving cross-sectoral collaboration. Collaboration across sectors was impeded by low relational coordination, including divergent goals, unclear roles, mutual mistrust and limited communication. An asymmetry in dependence between sectors was evident: GPs and CWs were dependent on information from MHPs during and after outpatient treatment, whereas MHPs were neither aware of this need nor expected ongoing updates. Patients felt vulnerable post-discharge, with little support, and the burden of navigating a complex healthcare system on their own. To improve collaboration, participants suggested online planning meetings, a coordinating liaison or care manager, and a smartphone application for patients to monitor their mental health and signs of relapse. Flexible return to work solutions were also emphasised. Discussion: Cross-sectoral collaboration in the care of severe depression is challenged by structural and relational barriers, leaving patients vulnerable and at increased risk of relapse during transitions between sectors. Strengthening coordination through shared planning, clearer roles, a coordinating liaison or care manager, digital tools, and flexible return-to-work solutions may ensure continuity and prevent relapse of depression.

Indexed as

depressiongeneral practicemental health servicemunicipalityprimary carequalitative methodssecondary care

Identifiers

PMID41103736
PMCPMC12521750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.