ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Retrospective evaluation of ERAS-guided rehabilitation nursing in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Reduces Hospital Stay and Postoperative Nausea in ACDF: A Meta-Analysis of 2330 Patients.Global spine journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an ERAS-based perioperative nursing pathway in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 156 ACDF patients (2022-2024), with 80 in the ERAS group and 76 in the control group. The ERAS group received interdisciplinary care including preoperative nutritional optimization, intraoperative hemodynamic stabilization, early mobilization, and multimodal analgesia. Primary endpoints: time to first flatus and length of hospital stay. Secondary endpoints: time to first defecation, time to first solid food intake, VAS pain scores (resting/moving), urinary catheter removal time, first ambulation time, JOA, NDI, PONV, and complications. Statistical analyses compared outcomes between groups using Results: The ERAS group demonstrated significantly shorter times to first flatus (7.89 ± 2.35 vs. 12.56 ± 4.12 h, Conclusion: Enhanced recovery after surgery-guided nursing improves gastrointestinal function, reduces pain, and accelerates functional recovery in ACDF patients without increasing complications. This interdisciplinary approach enhances perioperative care efficiency and supports patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.