Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103700›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Pedagogical innovation and educator wellbeing in UK audiology teaching: cross-institutional insights from the COVID-19 experience.

Srikanth Chundu, Natalie Morley, Cathrine V Jansson-Boyd, Bhavisha Parmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Srikanth ChunduSchool of Psychology, Sports and Sensory Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Natalie MorleySchool of Psychology, Sports and Sensory Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cathrine V Jansson-BoydSchool of Psychology, Sports and Sensory Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Bhavisha ParmarFaculty of Brain Sciences, Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Academic teaching staff in higher education routinely balance multiple roles, including teaching, research, and pastoral student care. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced the closure of university campuses, significantly intensified these demands. To maintain the continuity and quality of education, staff were required to swiftly adapt and implement new, robust teaching methods. This sudden shift placed additional pressure on an already stretched workforce. This study aims to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on audiology education in the United Kingdom (UK), with a particular focus on the work-related wellbeing of academic teaching staff. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with eleven teaching staff involved in audiology higher education across the UK. Results: The following four themes were identified (1) initial institutional response to the pandemic, (2) adapting practical audiology training through teleaudiology and patient simulation, (3) supporting students whilst safeguarding staff wellbeing, and (4) pedagogical approaches for a unique, technology-driven audiology profession. Conclusion: The detrimental impact of the pandemic on academic staff well-being was evident in the form of increased workloads and escalating institutional pressures, which frequently prioritized student well-being over that of staff. Audiology HEI educators acknowledged that while audiology training cannot be entirely conducted online due to the essential hands-on skills that must be practiced in person, a hybrid or blended learning approach could be beneficial.

Indexed as

audiologyhealth educationhigher educationpedagogyteaching

Identifiers

PMID41103700
PMCPMC12521181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.