SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Multimodal prehabilitation is an effective strategy to reduce postoperative complications and improve physical function and anxiety in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multidisciplinary virtual (p)rehabilitation model of care for colorectal cancer surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- Multimodal prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- The Multidisciplinary Approach to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Prehabilitation in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Clinical Functioning Information Tool (ClinFIT) in Colorectal Surgical Prehabilitation: A Prospective Observational Study.Advances in rehabilitation science and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative prehabilitation represents a viable approach to improve postoperative recovery and quality of life in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, though debates persist regarding the efficacy of specific prehabilitation modalities. Objective: This study aims to compare and rank prehabilitation strategies for enhancing postoperative outcomes in CRC patients through a network meta-analysis, identifying the optimal preoperative prehabilitation method. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing four prehabilitation strategies in CRC patients. Outcome measures focused on postoperative complications, hospital stay duration, 6-min walk test, and states of anxiety and depression. The effect sizes for dichotomous outcomes were measured by odds ratios (OR), and for continuous outcomes by mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD), with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results: Our analysis included 27 RCTs involving 2,946 CRC patients. NMA results indicated that, compared to the control group (CON), only the multimodal (Mul) approach significantly reduced postoperative complications (OR: 0.47, 95%CrI: 0.26-0.85) and hospitalization time (MD: -1.17, 95CrI: -1.77 to -0.57). Moreover, Mul was the only strategy that improved pre-surgical 6-min walk test results (MD: 27.22, 95CrI: 12.71-41.73) and anxiety levels (SMD: -0.69, 95CrI: -1.34 to -0.04), with sustained improvements in the 6-min walk test observed up to 4 weeks post-surgery (MD: 19.22, 95CrI: 5.94-32.50). Conclusion: The Mul prehabilitation program is the effective strategy for improving surgical outcomes in CRC patients. This comprehensive approach not only aids in reducing postoperative complications and shortening hospital stays but also enhances physical and psychological readiness before surgery. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024514661.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.