ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2025
Case Report: A Challenging Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in a Patient with Enlarged and Bifid Transverse Processes.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Superior hypogastric plexus block (SHPB) is an established treatment for chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Anatomical variations can significantly complicate interventional pain procedures. Case Presentation: We present a case of a 44-year-old woman with CPP secondary to endometriosis and unique lumbosacral (L-S) anatomy, including enlarged and bifid transverse processes, which posed a challenge to standard SHPB techniques. This necessitated a tailored approach to ensure success and patient safety. Successful bilateral blockade was achieved using a combination of posterolateral and trans-discal approaches under fluoroscopic guidance. The patient reported substantial pain relief and improved quality of life. Conclusions: This case underscores the clinical relevance of recognizing and adapting to anatomical variations during SHPB to optimize procedural success and patient outcomes. Despite the limitations inherent in its retrospective design and reliance on existing clinical data, this study reinforces the need for individualized approaches in similar interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.