Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103626›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2025

Evaluating the impact of camouflaged and insulin syringes with and without counter-stimulation on anxiety and behavior in children during administration of local anesthesia.

Aditi Hagwane, Dinesh Rao, Sunil Panwar, Surbhi Sharma, Manan Phalke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aditi HagwaneDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Pacific Dental College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan State, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5111-0942
Dinesh RaoDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Pacific Dental College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan State, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-3334
Sunil PanwarDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Pacific Dental College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan State, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-5863
Surbhi SharmaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Pacific Dental College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan State, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5452-4785
Manan PhalkeDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Pacific Dental College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan State, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9735-3387

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fear of injections and dental anxiety are the major barriers to successful pediatric dental treatment. Visual threats associated with conventional syringes can increase anxiety and pain perception in children, necessitating the use of child-friendly strategies. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the impact of camouflaged and insulin syringes, with and without counter-stimulation, on anxiety levels, pain perception, and behavioral responses during local anesthesia administration in children. Methods: A clinical trial involving 120 children aged 8-10 years who required bilateral maxillary local anesthesia was performed. Local anesthesia with camouflaged and insulin syringes was administered to each child once with and without thumb pressure counter-stimulation. Anxiety was measured using pulse rates, pain was measured using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, and behavior was measured using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale. Statistical analyses were performed using the independent t-test and chi-square test. Results: Both groups were demographically comparable with no significant differences in age (independent t-test, P = 0.539) or sex distribution (chi-square test, P = 0.854). At first appointment, camouflaged syringes showed significantly lower pain scores (3.58 ± 0.74 vs. 4.17 ± 1.37; P = 0.005), lower pulse rates (89.10 ± 5.84 vs. 99.00 ± 1.80 bpm; P < 0.001), and better behavioral responses (FLACC score: 2.27 ± 0.78 vs. 2.80 ± 0.68; P < 0.001) compared with insulin syringes, as assessed by the independent t-test. These effects were further enhanced by counter-stimulation. At second appointment, although overall scores improved in both groups, post-treatment differences between the syringe types were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Camouflaged syringes combined with counter stimulation represent an effective, simple, and non-pharmacological method for reducing anxiety and improving cooperation during local anesthesia administration in pediatric dental patients. However, the findings are limited by the use of a homogenous sample of healthy, cooperative children aged 8-10 years and potential bias due to the inability of blind operators or participants. Future studies should evaluate a broader population and incorporate blind assessment protocols.

Indexed as

Camouflaged SyringeDental AnxietyFearPain

Identifiers

PMID41103626
PMCPMC12521832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.