ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2025
Time-dependent changes in flap-site pain compared with overall surgical pain after oral cancer resection and reconstruction: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sensory Abnormalities and Pain in the Donor Sites of Radial Forearm and Fibula Free Flaps-A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Volumetric changes associated with immediate implant placement and Bio-Oss collagen.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative analgesia after oral cancer surgery with free-flap reconstruction is complex because pain arises at both donor and recipient sites and likely varies by flap type. Evidence of flap-specific, time-resolved pain and related patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) behaviors is limited. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort included 127 adults who underwent no flap (n = 53), latissimus dorsi(LD; n = 12), fibula (n = 18), forearm (n = 30), or other flaps (n = 14). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded for overall pain (0-72 h), recipient-site pain (0-72 h), and donor-site pain (12-72 h). Intravenous PCA consisted of fentanyl (700 or 1400 mcg) plus ketorolac (150 mg). PCA logs provided demand counts, effective deliveries, and infused volumes. Group comparisons were performed using repeated-measures analyses with post hoc tests. Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. Overall VAS scores differed at most time points from 0 to 72 h (all P ≤ 0.013); the fibula group started higher and declined thereafter. Recipient-site pain showed no between-group difference at 60 h but diverged at 72 h (P = 0.026). Donor site pain showed no overall difference, although the fibula tended to remain higher at 12-24 h. In the LD subgroup, recipient-site VAS scores increased again after 48 h. Total anesthesia time differed markedly and was longest in LD cases (P < 0.001). Among flap patients, fentanyl concentration (700 vs. 1400 mcg) did not differ by flap type. Seventy-two-hour cumulative PCA metrics did not differ between groups; however, effective deliveries were higher during the early 12-24 h window (12 h, P = 0.043; 24 h, P = 0.010). At 12 h, endotracheal tube discomfort exceeded recipient- and donor-site pain (Friedman χ Conclusion: Flap-specific, time-dependent pain trajectories were identified-early higher pain in fibula and later recipient- or donor-persistence in LD flaps. Early differences in PCA deliveries were not reflected in 72-h totals, indicating a partial dissociation between VAS intensity and analgesic-seeking behavior. These findings support flap-tailored multimodal analgesia and time-resolved PCA adjustments, with attention to airway-related discomfort early after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.