ArticleJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2025
Protocol for EHS Guideline on Treatment of Ventral and Incisional Hernias in Emergency.
Article in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- FasciotensHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- EHS Guidelines on the Management of Primary Ventral and Incisional Hernias Under Emergency Conditions.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Review
- Multimodal Prehabilitation for Hernia Repair: Linking Metabolic Modulation and Mechanical Methods.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergency presentations of ventral and incisional hernias are common and associated with significantly higher morbidity and mortality than elective procedures. Despite their frequency, clinical guidance on managing acutely complicated hernias in emergency settings remains limited and heterogeneous. Objective: This protocol outlines the development of an evidence-based clinical guideline by the European Hernia Society (EHS) to support general and emergency surgeons in treating acutely complicated ventral and incisional hernias in adults. Methods: Developed according to AGREE-S and GRADE methodologies, this guideline will address seven key clinical questions concerning the use of mesh, surgical approach, and technique based on clinical contamination status and anatomical considerations. A steering group of hernia surgery experts and methodologists leads the project, supported by two independent evidence review teams. Patient input will be obtained via structured surveys to incorporate values and preferences. Systematic literature reviews, evidence-to-decision frameworks, and consensus meetings will guide the formulation of recommendations, with strength and direction defined according to GRADE standards. Discussion: This is the first EHS guideline specifically targeting the emergency management of incisional and ventral hernias. By addressing urgent clinical decisions through a structured, transparent, and inclusive process, it aims to reduce variability in care, improve outcomes, and serve as a resource for clinical practice and future research. The guideline will be published open access and monitored for implementation and updates based on emerging evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.