ArticleNeurotrauma reports2025
The Association Between Daily Registrations of Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms Using an mHealth App and the Retrospective Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire.
Article in Neurotrauma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A substantial number of people experience persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) following a concussion. Traditional retrospective assessments, such as the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), are prone to memory biases and do not capture the day-to-day variability of PPCS. In this study, we explored the association between daily registrations of PPCS and the RPQ. We also examined the variability of PPCS trajectories over time. Nineteen participants registered PPCS symptoms for 28 days using an mHealth app and then completed the RPQ. From the final 7 days, average, highest, and last-day symptom scores were calculated and correlated with corresponding RPQ items. Scores from the full 28-day period were used to compute the within-person standard deviation and mean squared successive difference (MSSD) for each symptom that participants rated as the most bothersome. Correlations between the RPQ and daily registrations were weak-to-medium (range: 0.343, 0.590). The retrospective RPQ explained up to 35% of the variance in average daily registrations of PPCS. The MSSD ranged from 0 to 16.29, and the within-person SD from 0 to 3.25. Visual analyses showed that participants with identical RPQ item scores often exhibited different PPCS variability. This was also true for different symptoms within the same participant. This study highlights the potential additional value of daily registrations for capturing the dynamic and fluctuating nature of PPCS, which may be missed by retrospective questionnaires administered at one time point. PPCS vary both within and between individuals over time and reducing this complexity to a single total score oversimplifies a nuanced reality. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings, and future work should investigate the clinical relevance of capturing daily variations in PPCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.