ArticleClinical case reports2025
The Richmond Crown Returns: A Laser-Assisted Approach to Restoring a Grossly Fractured Maxillary Central Incisor.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Richmond Crown Returns: A Laser-Assisted Approach to Restoring a Grossly Fractured Maxillary Central Incisor.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extensive coronal destruction following trauma or caries presents a recurring challenge in prosthodontic rehabilitation, particularly in the esthetic zone. A multidisciplinary approach combining traditional post-core systems with contemporary surgical adjuncts ensures optimal long-term outcomes. This paper reports the management of a grossly fractured maxillary central incisor using a Richmond crown following diode laser-assisted crown lengthening. A 21-year-old male patient presented with pulpal necrosis and apical periodontitis in tooth 21. After nonsurgical endodontic therapy, post space preparation was performed while preserving a 5 mm apical seal. Diode laser gingivectomy allowed for biological width preservation and adequate ferrule creation. An indirectly fabricated Richmond crown was luted using glass ionomer cement. Six-month follow-up confirmed the restoration's stability, periodontal health, and patient satisfaction. This report highlights the relevance of combining historically proven techniques like the Richmond crown with minimally invasive adjuncts, offering a conservative, cost-effective, and esthetically superior alternative to implants. It emphasizes the need for clinicians to revisit classical restorative methods, especially in cases with significant structural compromise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.