ArticleClinical case reports2025
Recurrent Parosteal Lipoma of the Mandible: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parosteal lipoma of the mandible: a case report of an asymptomatic, non-ossifying variant.Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Case Report: Ossifying parosteal lipoma of the mandible with cortical continuity: surgical considerations from a rare case and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Recurrent Parosteal Lipoma of the Mandible: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While lipomas commonly arise in adipose-rich subcutaneous tissues of the trunk/extremities, parosteal lipomas involving the mandible represent exceptionally rare entities. This novel case demonstrates successful surgical management of recurrent mandibular parosteal lipoma, the first documented craniofacial recurrence. We emphasize early intervention guided by CT/MRI and intraoperative assessment to ensure complete en bloc resection with adequate margins. Despite their typically low recurrence rate, meticulous subperiosteal dissection addressing juxtacortical adherence proves critical to mitigate complications and recurrence risks in anatomically complex regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.