Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103572›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction open2025

Decoding uterine (dys)function in fibroids through multimodal assessment of functional determinants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Noemi Salmeri, Edgardo Somigliana, Alexander Fiore, Davide Marinello, Benedetta Maizza, Francesca Filippi, Paola Viganò, Fabio Parazzini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Noemi SalmeriDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3239-3799
Edgardo SomiglianaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0223-0032
Alexander FioreInfertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Davide MarinelloInfertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Benedetta MaizzaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Francesca FilippiInfertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Paola ViganòInfertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3674-5912
Fabio ParazziniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-4854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Question: Is there a difference in uterine functional determinants between women with fibroids and women without myometrial pathology? Summary Answer: Women with uterine fibroids consistently exhibit altered uterine functional determinants compared to controls, characterized by increased perfusion, elevated stiffness, and impaired contractility. What is Known Already: The functional determinants of the non-pregnant uterus remain largely unexplored and underreported. Uterine fibroids, as a well-defined morphological myometrial pathology, offer a unique model for understanding uterine functionality. Study Design Size Duration: This systematic review and meta-analysis included original articles published in English and indexed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases up to 20 December 2024. The search strategy combined terms related to uterine fibroids with those describing uterine functional parameters (e.g. uterine vascularity, stiffness, and contractility), together with diagnostic methods (including Doppler ultrasound, elastography, and magnetic resonance imaging). Participants/Materials Setting Methods: Observational studies evaluating quantitative uterine functional determinants in non-pregnant women with fibroids and controls without myometrial pathology were selected using predefined Population, Intervention (Investigated measure), Comparator, Outcome(s), Study type (PICOS) criteria. Outcomes included quantitative measures of uterine functionality such as vascularization (uterine artery Doppler indices), stiffness (elastography parameters), and contractility (peristalsis parameters). Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled estimates for continuous outcomes were calculated using random-effects models, expressed as mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses addressed potential confounders, including menopausal status, hormonal therapy use, and symptom severity. Main Results and the Role of Chance: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria: seven on vascularization (n = 961), five on stiffness (n = 342), and two on contractility (n = 62). The uterine artery pulsatility index was significantly lower in women with fibroids compared to controls (MD -0.63, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.36; Limitations Reasons for Caution: The relatively small study population and high heterogeneity of estimates warrant cautious interpretation, although findings were consistent across multiple uterine functional determinants. Wider Implications of the Findings: Women with uterine fibroids consistently exhibit altered uterine functional determinants compared to controls without myometrial pathology, highlighting how structural abnormalities parallel functional changes. Leveraging fibroids as a model, integrating structural imaging with functional assessment through advanced multimodal approaches may deepen our understanding of uterine diseases, ultimately enhancing treatment and patient care. Study Funding/Competing Interests: This study was partially funded by the Italian Ministry of Health-Current research IRCCS. The funding source had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication. E.S. reports payments from Ferring, Theramex, and IBSA for research grants and honoraria from IBSA, Gedeon-Richter, and Sandoz for lectures. He serves as Editor-in-Chief of Registration Number: PROSPERO ID: CRD42024619633-registered on 10 December 2024.

Indexed as

elastographyuterine arteriesuterine fibroidsuterine peristalsisuterine vascularization

Identifiers

PMID41103572
PMCPMC12527344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.