ArticleTrauma case reports2025
Fat embolism syndrome following severe blunt chest trauma treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case report.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fat embolism syndrome (FES) often occurs following long bone fractures and presents with respiratory symptoms in 90 % of cases. Although rare, the mortality rate ranges from 5 % to 20 %. Its pathophysiology involves fat obstruction in the pulmonary arteries or free fatty acids that damage the alveoli. Treatment primarily involves supportive care, including lung-protective ventilation strategies such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) management. We report a case of severe FES that required veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Case presentation: A man in his 30s sustained multiple traumatic injuries, including bilateral pneumothorax, unstable pelvic fractures, and multiple rib and limb fractures, after falling from the seventh floor of a building. The Injury Severity Score and probability of survival were 43 and 10.4 %, respectively. The initial management included chest drainage, external pelvic fixation, and massive transfusion. On day 9, the patient developed ARDS (PaO Conclusion: VV-ECMO can be life-saving for FES with ARDS, especially when standard treatments are not feasible owing to injury constraints. Early implementation is recommended in select cases to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.