Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103514›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Machine learning predicts significant improvement in motor aphasia with tongue acupuncture.

Qixiu Wang, Guoce Zhan, Hongfei Zhou, Jun Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qixiu WangLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Liaoning, China.
Guoce ZhanLiaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Liaoning, China.
Hongfei ZhouAffiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Liaoning, China.
Jun LiuAffiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Motor aphasia is a common language disorder that significantly disrupts patients' communication abilities and quality of life. Recent studies have shown that acupuncture treatment is effective for motor aphasia, but in clinical practice, the selection of acupuncture points for motor aphasia is diverse and lacks a unified standard. Therefore, by analyzing a range of clinical parameters encompassing multiple acupuncture points, we identified independent predictive factors for recovery from motor aphasia following acupuncture treatment. Materials and methods: This retrospective case-control study included 144 patients with motor aphasia at Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital (2019-2023). Propensity score matching (PSM) balanced baseline characteristics (age, gender, disease factors, comorbidities) using 1:1 nearest neighbor matching (caliper = 0.2 SD). LASSO, Random Survival Forest, and Gradient Boosting Machine algorithms selected 44 variables, and a multivariate Cox regression model assessed treatment outcomes. Results: After PSM, baseline characteristics were balanced between the treatment group (tongue acupuncture, Conclusion: Tongue acupuncture enhances motor aphasia recovery, while older age and delayed rehabilitation hinder it. PSM and machine learning ensured robust predictions, supporting early tongue acupuncture. Future multicenter studies will further validate these findings.

Indexed as

clinical characteristicsmachine learningmotor aphasiapropensity score matchingtongue acupuncture

Identifiers

PMID41103514
PMCPMC12520874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.