ArticleJournal of family and economic issues2025
Childhood Predictors of Midlife Finance Outcomes in the Chicago Longitudinal Study.
Article in Journal of family and economic issues, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the predictors of financial assets (e.g., savings and retirement assets) at early midlife in a sample of 1,092 individuals (93.7% Black American) who grew up in low-income neighborhoods. Data were drawn from the Chicago Longitudinal Study, which has tracked participants from early childhood to midlife and consists of participant, parent, teacher surveys, and administrative records. The main outcomes were savings in 2019 dollars (log) and savings in the top quartile of the study sample, both self-reported at age 35-37. Hierarchical linear and binary logistic regression analyses identified many significant (p < .05 or p < .01) predictors of assets, including: involvement in child welfare system by age 5 (b = -1.55), Child-Parent Center preschool participation (b = 0.77), early math achievement (b = 0.05), socio-emotional adjustment (0.18), grade retention (b = -1.14), school quality (b = 1.50), and juvenile arrest (b = -2.17). The strongest alterable predictors in the full model were involvement in child welfare system, socio-emotional adjustment, grade retention, school quality, and juvenile arrest. The full model also indicated that males had greater savings and Black participants fewer savings. Parent expectations and involvement as well as school quality also predicted top quartile savings status. Implications for future research and practice are discussed. The contribution of school experiences in early and middle childhood suggests greater investments in programs that promote socio-emotional learning and academic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.