ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Living during COVID-19: qualitative analysis of Experts by Experience UK University Associates' socioeconomic inequalities, including readiness recommendations.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A vulnerable group of people with disabilities and carers (Experts by Experience) wished for research during the COVID-19 pandemic to assist other people with disabilities in the future. Consideration of this vulnerable group seems to be limited in future policy pandemic readiness despite huge potential mortality. Literature reviewed critical public health theory through assessing health inequalities and health equity in relation to disability/chronic ill health. A standard qualitative thematic method distinguished socioeconomic health inequalities for people with earlier mental/psychosocial distress and other Experts by Experience-including people with physical, visual, self-identified hidden disabilities, and their carers. Environmental, community, and individual challenge were part of the overarching theme. Up to five sub-themes were: shielding, diminished quality of life, use of social media vs. the digital divide, people with hidden disabilities, activism, celebrating lockdowns' ends, loss in stability of outlook, loneliness/isolation, coping strategies, developing new skills, re-evaluating lives because the world will change. Discussion of findings relied on four critical public health pillars; included were future recommendations for pandemic/emergency readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.