ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Next generation targeted non-genotoxic conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell and hematopoietic stem cell-based gene therapy.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene therapy for hereditary hematological disorders: From clinical breakthroughs to future horizons.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Review
- Alternative conditioning regimens for hemoglobinopathy gene therapy: balancing efficacy, toxicity, and the next frontier.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Article
- Oncogenesis as an Adverse Effect of Gene Replacement Therapy in Hematopoietic Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-based gene therapy, including gene editing approaches, offer a promising strategy for addressing numerous lymphohematopoietic genetic defects. Although significant progress has been made since the first HSCT over 60 years ago, the widespread application of allogeneic HSCT and autologous gene therapy is still hindered by the need for pre-transplant conditioning. The eradication of host HSCs and their progeny is widely thought to be necessary to create "space" in the bone marrow niche and enable long term engraftment of transplanted cells. However, despite decades of research, alkylating agents such as busulfan, melphalan and treosulfan or total body irradiation still remain the backbone of most HSCT condidtioning regimens. These genotoxic conditioning agents are non-targeted and leave patients susceptible to infections, infertility, organ toxicities, and secondary malignancies. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop alternative, non-genotoxic conditioning regimens that can selectively deplete HSCs while sparing cells outside the lymphohematopoietic compartment. A growing body of preclinical and clinical breakthroughs demonstrate the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, immunotoxins, radioimmunotherapy compounds, and even T cell redirection strategies for achieving targeted HSC elimination. The use of these new agents can transform HSCT, and in this review we aim to highlight the potential and limitations of next-generation, non-genotoxic or minimally toxic conditioning methods. These alternatives to conventional chemoradiation could reduce toxicity and improve the safety of HSC-based gene therapies, ultimately expanding patient access and eligibility for these transformative treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.