Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103395›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2025

From practice to lecture hall: Optimizing communication courses in medical education.

Friederike Laudage, Thomas Kötter, Daniel Wiswede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Friederike LaudageUniversity Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Campus, Institute of Medical Psychology, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas KötterUniversity Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Campus, Institute of General Medicine, Lübeck, Germany.
Daniel WiswedeUniversity Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck Campus, Institute of Medical Psychology, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Communication skills are a central component of the medical profession and are already taught during medical studies. However, the design of teaching content for doctor-patient communication across Germany is not based on empirical data collected from physicians' everyday professional practice, meaning optimal preparation for future work is not guaranteed. The aim of this study was to identify the need for relevant topic content and to use the limited teaching time in communication courses for these topics, providing educators with empirically based selection criteria. Methodology: Using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, the need for relevant topics was determined. All teaching practices of the University of Lübeck were invited in writing to participate in the study. Teaching physicians rated, using a topic catalogue, which topics they considered relevant for communication courses in medical studies, as well as how challenging and frequent these topics are in everyday professional life. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 46 of the 70 invited teaching physicians (65.7%). Fifteen topics, including Conclusion: The results provide tailored recommendations for case studies in communication courses that are relevant for medical students' later professional practice. A concrete implementation involves the selection of relevant topics, enabling the practice of frequently encountered but less challenging topics at the beginning of studies and more difficult but rarer topics in advanced studies.

Indexed as

CommunicationCurriculumEducation, MedicalPhysician-Patient RelationsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingcommunication skillscommunication trainingdoctor-patient communicationmedical educationNational Competency-based Learning Objectives Catalogue for Medicine (NKLM)

Identifiers

PMID41103395
PMCPMC12527397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.