ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2025
Racz Catheter Technique Versus Conventional Technique in Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection for Management of Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Delivery of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection (TFESI) for Radiculopathy Associated with Acute Lumbar Disc Prolapse Through Physiotherapist-led Assessment, Consent, and Direct Listing.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2026Article
- The Role of Diagnostic Targeted Epidural Injection in the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: A Retrospective Analysis on 99 Patients.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are widely employed for managing low back pain (LBP), particularly when conservative treatment fails. The Racz catheter technique offers targeted drug delivery and mechanical adhesiolysis, potentially enhancing outcomes in chronic LBP. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the Racz catheter technique and the conventional technique in lumbar epidural steroid injection for the management of LBP. Methods: This randomized, controlled, double-blind study was conducted on a sample of 60 patients, aged 18 - 65, comprising both sexes, who had persistent lumbar pain, grade 1 spondylolisthesis, and facet osteoarthropathy with small disc findings on radiological examination. Participants were randomized equally into two groups. The Racz catheter group received lumbar epidural steroids using a Racz catheter, while the conventional lumbar group received conventional lumbar steroid injections. Results: The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire (OSW) scores were insignificantly different at baseline, immediately post-procedure, and at 1 month between both groups. However, they were significantly lower at 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months in the Racz catheter group compared to the conventional lumbar group (P < 0.05). Incidences of hypotension, paraesthesia, bleeding, and headache were insignificantly different between both groups. Patient satisfaction levels were significantly higher in the Racz catheter group than in the conventional lumbar group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The Racz catheter technique is a superior interventional option for lumbar epidural steroid delivery in patients with persistent LBP, providing enhanced pain relief, improved functional outcomes, greater patient satisfaction, and equivalent procedural safety compared to the conventional technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.