ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Predictive value of the electrocardiogram exercise stress test for the presence or absence of left main disease.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The ability of the electrocardiogram exercise stress test (ECG-EST) in excluding the presence of left main (LM) coronary artery disease (CAD) has been poorly investigated. Methods: We retrospectively selected patients who underwent both ECG-EST and elective invasive coronary angiography (ICA) at our Institution between January 2018 and December 2023 due to angina pain suspected of obstructive CAD. Preventively defined individual and combined ECG-EST variables suggesting no/mild myocardial ischemia were assessed as predictors of the absence of LM disease. Some ECG-EST variables suggesting extensive/severe myocardial ischemia were instead assessed as predictors of the presence of LM disease, defined as a stenosis ≥50% of the left main artery. Results: Overall, 515 patients were included (age 66.2 ± 11 years; 74% men). LM disease at ICA was found in 26 patients (5%). Individual and combined ECG-EST variables showed low positive predictive values for LM-CAD [maximum 15% for a combination of ST-segment depression (STD) in ≥ 5 leads and ECG-EST duration <360 s]. The negative predictive value, however, was very high for some combined ECG-EST variables. Very low risk of LM disease (≤2.5%) was particularly shown in patients with peak heart rate (HR) ≥ 75% of maximal predicted HR for age and STD < 2 mm (prevalence 63.1%; risk 2.2%) and peak HR ≥85% of maximal predicted HR for age and maximal STD < 2 mm (prevalence 46.2%; risk 2.5%). Conclusions: Among patients with angina chest pain suspected of obstructive CAD, ECG-EST results can reliably identify those at very low risk of LM disease at coronary angiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.