SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pneumococcal infections are the leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality, and efforts have been made to search for effective means of prevention and control to reduce their serious threat to children's health. This study intends to investigate the efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) in children. Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase up to June 19, 2024. Children aged 0-2 years were included, and PCV was given in the intervention group and a placebo in the control group. The outcomes were immunogenicity, safety, and adverse events. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan and Stata17, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 was utilized for quality assessment. Results: Eleven studies involving 147,274 participants were included. Meta-analyses revealed that compared with placebo, PCV greatly lowered the incidence of pneumonia (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70, 0.87; Conclusion: PCV reduces the incidence of pneumonia and improves the levels of IgG antibodies. However, given the lack of data on adverse events in the included studies, we hope that standardized reporting methods for safety outcomes can be adopted in future randomized controlled trials to improve data comparability and utility and provide a more solid basis for evidence-based decision-making. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024570854, PROSPERO CRD42024570854.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.