ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Two cases of polyorchidism: case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the diagnosis, clinical presentation, and management of polyorchidism, aiming to enhance awareness of this rare condition. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of two children diagnosed with polyorchidism at the Qingdao University Affiliated Women and Children's Hospital between December 2022 and January 2025. A comprehensive review of the relevant literature was also performed. Results: (1) Case 1: A 3-year and 9-month-old male presented with a palpable mass in the right scrotum, initially diagnosed as a right-sided inguinal hernia. Preoperative ultrasound suggested the mass might be a testicle. The mass was completely excised and sent for pathological examination, which confirmed the diagnosis of polyorchidism. Case 2: A 7-year-old male presented with a reducible mass in the left scrotum for 6 months and a history of phimosis. Initial diagnosis included left-sided inguinal hernia and phimosis. Preoperative ultrasound suggested a left inguinal hernia, with bilateral testicular asymmetry. The right testicle showed increased mobility, and an echoic mass was observed in the right scrotum, indicating the possibility of polyorchidism. The patient underwent laparoscopic high ligation of bilateral hernia sacs, excision of the right scrotal mass, and circumcision. Pathology confirmed the diagnosis of polyorchidism. Both testicles of the two children could be palpated in the scrotum, with normal texture and no tenderness. Both children were cured and discharged without complications. Follow-up showed no abnormalities. (2) A summary of the clinical features and treatment of polyorchidism was compiled from both this case series and previous reports. Conclusion: Polyorchidism is an extremely rare congenital anomaly of the male reproductive system. Pediatric surgeons and urologists should increase awareness of this condition to avoid misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.