ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
Tracing microbial hazards in the aquatic supply chain: challenges, technologies, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aquatic products are a crucial source of dietary protein, especially in regions with abundant marine resources. However, with the expansion of global trade, the risk of microbial contamination in these products has increased, leading to serious public health concerns due to extended transportation and varying regulatory standards. Foodborne illnesses associated with aquatic products not only impact consumer health but also result in significant economic losses due to reduced market confidence, brand damage, and costly recalls. This review systematically examines the role of traceability technologies in enhancing microbial safety in aquatic products. Emphasis is placed on the integration of genome sequencing, artificial intelligence, and digital monitoring systems within the traceability framework. The evaluation considers specific performance indicators, including detection sensitivity (for example, the minimum limit of detection for target pathogens), source attribution resolution (for example, ≤20 core-genome SNP differences or unique wgMLST allelic profiles), and time-to-result in outbreak scenarios, as well as accessibility for small-scale producers and scalability across diverse aquaculture environments. In particular, we outline how artificial intelligence can be integrated with genome sequencing. For instance, WGS-derived genomic fingerprints can be transformed into machine learning models for rapid and highly sensitive microbial source prediction, thereby enhancing real-time decision-making capability along the aquatic product supply chain. Traceability systems have proven effective in enabling real-time monitoring and rapid response to contamination events. Technologies such as genome sequencing and AI significantly enhance detection speed and accuracy, contributing to improved food safety management. Nonetheless, challenges remain, including technological barriers for small-scale producers, fragmented international standards, and low public awareness. To overcome these limitations, future efforts should focus on developing cost-effective and user-friendly traceability tools, promoting global standardization, strengthening regulatory frameworks, and increasing public engagement. Furthermore, innovative approaches involving big data analytics, and AI hold great promise for advancing microbial safety and ensuring the integrity of aquatic product supply chains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.